GUEST BLOG: Peter Newman on filling the (silence)

It’s publication week for Peter Newman’s excellent The Vagrant (out 23rd April) and he’s shared his experience of writing a silent character with us.  

When I first started writing The Vagrant, I knew that I wanted my protagonist to be silent and I also knew that I didn’t want to share his thoughts with the reader. I liked the purity of it, to have a character that is judged on what he does rather than what he says or thinks. We are often given the keys to a character’s personality through their thoughts. I wanted the Vagrant to be a mystery that the reader could gradually solve as they read the book, coming to their own conclusions about him based solely on his actions.

However, most books have a hefty amount of page space devoted to dialogue and inner monologue and it was really challenging working without those things to fall back on. In the early parts of the book the Vagrant’s principle companions are a baby and a goat, so there isn’t a great deal of idle chatter. But there are still meaningful relationships between them, conveyed through the Vagrant’s occasional battles with the goat or his managing of the baby, and the moments of fun they sometimes manage to steal from the demon-infested wasteland.

The Vagrant small

Working in this way helped me to appreciate the significance of silence. I’ve always enjoyed the work of Harold Pinter and the way his scripts would use: ‘’ to denote a short pause, ‘(pause)’ to denote a longer pause, and ‘(silence)’ to suggest a more significant gap in the dialogue. Or the films of Akira Kurosawa where whole stories are told in a single lingering shot on a character’s eyes. In The Vagrant, I tried to create a sense of silence and then fill it with atmosphere and mood. It forced me to think a lot about how I would convey a character’s state of mind in a more understated manner.

It also made me focus on action, on what the Vagrant actually does. The movements of his eyes and eyebrows, his smile or lack of it, the clenching of a fist, the tilt of his head and so on. Where another character might argue, or express their feelings, the Vagrant is limited to simple gestures of yes, no or something non-committal.

I could have used other methods to circumvent that (sign language for example) but I wanted a character without a voice of any kind, with all the frustrations and difficulties that brings.

It also means that the Vagrant’s choices are often presented without context. If he decides to help someone or abandon them, the reader is left to guess why. An interesting effect of this is that I’ve had him described in radically different ways by test readers. One saw him as a gentle, caring figure, another as a cold, tough warrior.

I have my own view of course but to give it would defeat the point. I’d much rather leave it for you to decide.

Order your copy of  The Vagrant here.

Other Articles

Introducing Kingdom of Souls by Rena Barron

When I sat down to write Kingdom of Souls many years ago, I was terrified. Growing up, I desperately searched for characters in books who looked like me and was always disappointed to find none. I loved reading stories where kids saved the world, tamed dragons, wielded magic, flew… Read More

Welcome to Rilpor, please enjoy the stabbing! by Anna Stephens

On 5 September 2019, the third book in my Godblind Trilogy will be published. Godblind, Darksoul and Bloodchild chart the story of an epic, world-changing and god-killing war of conquest and religious zealotry, not just between the neighbouring kingdoms of Rilpor and Mireces, but between the Gods… Read More

The End of a Trilogy by Anna Smith Spark

Five years ago I sat down and started writing a scene of violence. Men in the desert. Heat. Sunlight. Battle. A hero with a terrible flaw in him. A story emerged, fully formed, pouring itself out of me, a whole world and its history there in my head, love and… Read More